People are animals, but animals are not human

There seems to be a lack of understanding and more than a few misconceptions about the target animals. This article addresses some of these misunderstandings and services, we must do if we want to prevent deaths and animal attacks. The problem seems to be our misconceptions that animals are driven by emotions rather than pure survival instinct. This leads to an attack from one animal to the human emotion of anger or revenge attribute. I know that not all people take these misunderstandings, which is measured. What I mean is that most people simply on the basis of the evidence. The evidence I refer to include television programs on Discovery, Animal Planet, TNT, etc. It also includes media and academia, even. Again, some programs are more guilty than others, but the margin of error from the smallest to the absurd.

The most important point to take the reader of this note, is that animals are animals that are driven by basic instincts needed to survive. You do not feel anger, jealousy, love, revenge, or the plot. Although some animals may contain the ability of these feelings, I doubt that these senses are highly developed and motivated by our own opinion. Thus, in an attempt to assign human emotions to animals motivations, we make a stupid mistake. Just try to look at the situation from the perspective of the animal. This should not be difficult, because we have the ability to reason to have. I just try to return to a mindset that there was, as we rubbed sticks and was based on cave walls. Green is as guilty as the hunter. If a nature lover is brutally attacked by an animal to survive and are usually the statement. "I knew what he was doing" That is not true. The animal knew what he was doing. They should also make the claim that not to do in this situation. This statement is actually true, to some extent. If we enter the desert you can not expect not to be attacked by a wild animal. What we expect is that there is a possibility and we must accept responsibility for this, if we go into the forest anyway.

Animals are threatened natural lands for the construction of houses, shops and other activities to bring people in fields where animals used for transport. Their territory is shrinking. So if we go into the forest, it is our responsibility. If a person in the woods for any reason, and is used by an animal, for whatever reason, is attacked by his fault. Why? Because they know that in his mind, that's a possibility. If you're in the woods with their children and are attacked, then blame the parents. Why? Because he knew that was a possibility. You have every right to take the risk, but when and if something happens you can not blame the animals.